I think that I can safely state that most clinicians have one or more patient experiences
that they will never forget. They can be times when a theory or health condition comes
sharply into focus in the real world of clinical practice or a near-miss situation
that comes to mind every time we encounter a similar case presentation. I have had
a number of such events, including one that involved a woman who had decided she was
ready to start a family and was seeking advice on how to best prepare for that journey.
It was relatively early in my career as a women’s health nurse practitioner. I had
been in full-time practice for about 4 years exclusively caring for women across the
life span. At that time, yearly women’s health visits were the standard of care and
always included a bimanual examination and cervical cancer screening. People who were
using hormonal contraception were required to follow up every 6 months, which also
meant a bimanual examination. I typically had 21 appointments daily on my schedule
with very few unkept visits. So, adding in the bimanual examinations that were performed
for those who came for the evaluation and management of reproductive system symptoms,
in 4 years I had probably performed about 20,000 bimanual examinations, plus or minus
a few hundred. Because many of the people I examined were not experiencing any symptoms,
most of the physical findings were what would be expected for healthy persons (ie,
“within normal limits,” although I never used that term, instead routinely describing
the physical findings that would be consistent with “normal” as I had been taught
by my mentors in nursing and medicine). This practice was very helpful for comparing
physical findings over a continuum of care and for consultation with more expert colleagues
on cases of conditions that were unfamiliar to me. As you probably already guessed,
one of those situations was the young woman who came in for a well-woman/ready to
start a family visit who we discovered had a very advanced case of endometriosis.
At the time, I only recognized that the uterus seemed “different” (ie, hard and immobile).
This led me to consult with my more experienced colleagues and obtain an appropriate
referral for this patient.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to The Journal for Nurse PractitionersAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Epidemiology of endometriosis.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1997; 24: 235-258
- High prevalence of endometriosis in infertile women with normal ovulation and normaspermic partners.Fertil Steril. 2009; 92: 68-74
- Endometriosis: Guideline of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. February 2022.https://www.eshre.eu/ Guidelines-and-Legal/Guidelines/Endometriosis-guideline.aspxDate accessed: March 14, 2022
- The Endometriosis Fertility Index is useful for predicting the ability to conceive without assisted reproductive technology treatment after laparoscopic surgery, regardless of endometriosis.Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018; 83: 493-498https://doi.org/10.1159/000480454
Biography
Section Editor Denise G. Link, PhD, WHNP-BC, FAAN, FAANP, is a clinical professor emerita at Arizona State University Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation in Phoenix. She can be reached at [email protected]
Article info
Publication history
Published online: April 13, 2022
Footnotes
In compliance with standard ethical guidelines, the author reports no relationships with business or industry that may pose a conflict of interest.
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.