<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/?rss=yes"><title>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</title><description>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners RSS feed: Current Issue. 
 JNP  provides a highly credible resource to help nurse practitioners stay current with the clinical and policy concerns affecting 
their day-to-day practice. In addition to peer-reviewed clinical articles,  JNP  features continuing education opportunities and 
opinions and commentary on pressing legislative, regulatory, and clinical practice issues. Popular features include Point-Counterpoint, 
Legal Limits, Test Your Knowledge crosswords, Prescription Pad, and Decoding Codes.  JNP  is the official journal of the American 
College of Nurse Practitioners and includes organizational information in every issue.</description><link>http://www.npjournal.org/?rss=yes</link><dc:publisher>Elsevier Inc.</dc:publisher><dc:language>en</dc:language><dc:rights> © 2010 American College of Nurse Practitioners. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </dc:rights><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:issn>1555-4155</prism:issn><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:publicationDate>March 2010</prism:publicationDate><prism:copyright> © 2010 American College of Nurse Practitioners. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. </prism:copyright><prism:rightsAgent>healthpermissions@elsevier.com</prism:rightsAgent><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510001170/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510001182/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000267/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000279/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000280/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000292/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000024/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000681/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509006667/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509005881/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000711/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509003997/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509002931/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509004000/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000309/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509006941/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509006953/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS155541550900693X/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000310/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000413/abstract?rss=yes"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000401/abstract?rss=yes"/></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510001170/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Erratum</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510001170/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The location of the Mayo Clinic was incorrect in the article “Chronic Disease Prevention Across the Lifespan” in the January 2010 issue of JNP, p. 22. The correct location is Rochester, MN. JNP regrets the error</description><dc:title>Erratum</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2010.02.021</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Errata</prism:section><prism:startingPage>168</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>168</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510001182/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Erratum</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510001182/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>The credentials for an author of the article “Prescribing Competencies for Advanced Practice Registered Nurses” in the February issue of JNP were incorrect. They should have been Tracy Klein, MS, RN, FNP-BC, FAANP. JNP regrets the error.</description><dc:title>Erratum</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2010.02.022</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Errata</prism:section><prism:startingPage>168</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>168</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000267/abstract?rss=yes"><title>NPs Continue to Be Under the Physician Microscope</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000267/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				
					
				   One of my colleagues sent me an article recently from the Journal for Clinical Epidemiology. In it, a familiar title caught my eye: “A Landmark Randomized Health Care Trial: The Burlington Trial of the Nurse Practitioner.” Another article by a similar title was published in 1974 in the New England Journal of Medicine by Walter O. Spitzer just as the nurse practitioner (NP) role was expanding in the United States. Spitzer was a leader in outcomes research; this was one of the first NP outcome studies published and certainly one of the most methodologically rigorous. Spitzer continued to be an international leader in evaluation research for many years and was part of the strong physician research group associated with McMaster University in Canada.</description><dc:title>NPs Continue to Be Under the Physician Microscope</dc:title><dc:creator>Marilyn W. Edmunds</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2010.01.005</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Editorial</prism:section><prism:startingPage>169</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>169</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000279/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Cultural Changes</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000279/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				
					
				   I recently experienced an “a-ha” moment at a meeting where Ed O'Neil, PhD, director of the Center for the Health Professions at the University of California-San Francisco, was addressing health care reform issues. He pointed out that above all, nursing in general needs to reform how it thinks about itself. He further noted that, for nurse practitioners (NPs), no regulatory changes will matter until there is a cultural change. “WOW!” was my initial thought, but as the next 24 hours passed, I started wondering what he meant; in what way is a “cultural” change needed? I did not see him again to ask, but really, this was an issue that I needed to think about for myself.</description><dc:title>Cultural Changes</dc:title><dc:creator>Marsha Siegel</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2010.01.006</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Letter from the ACNP President</prism:section><prism:startingPage>170</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>170</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000280/abstract?rss=yes"><title>News</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000280/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				
					
				   In December, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first generic versions of Aricept (donepezil hydrochloride) orally disintegrating tablets. Donepezil hydrochloride is indicated for the treatment of dementia related to Alzheimer disease (AD). “Generics offer greater access to health care for all Americans,” said Gary Buehler, director of the FDA's Office of Generic Drugs. “Health care professionals and consumers can be assured that FDA-approved generic drugs have met the same rigorous standards as the brand-name drug and are the same as the branded in dosage form, safety, strength, route of administration, quality, performance characteristics, and intended use.”</description><dc:title>News</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2010.01.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>News</prism:section><prism:startingPage>172</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>174</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000292/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Pros and Cons of Mandated Collaboration</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000292/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				
					
				   The following seven states have no legal requirements for physician involvement in nurse practitioner (NP) practice: Alaska, Idaho, Maine, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington. (In Maine, an NP must practice under physician supervision for 24 months, but after that may practice without mandated physician involvement. In Utah, NPs need a physician collaborator only to prescribe controlled medications. Sometimes people include the District of Columbia in the list of states without mandatory collaboration. The District's code says, “Generally, advanced practice registered nurses shall carry out acts of advanced registered nursing in collaboration with a licensed physician or osteopath.” Nothing need be filed with the board of nursing.</description><dc:title>The Pros and Cons of Mandated Collaboration</dc:title><dc:creator>Carolyn Buppert</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2010.01.008</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Legal Limits</prism:section><prism:startingPage>175</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>176</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000024/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Accurate Use of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Determining Risk of Prostate Cancer</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000024/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
				Measuring the level of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in serum is used as a screening tool for prostate cancer. As more research results on improving the specificity and sensitivity of PSA testing become available, primary care providers will be provided with other methods to indicate when a urology referral is needed. The belief that the normal range is 0 to 4 ng/mL has not been supported by research. Multiple factors such as age, medication, and inflammatory processes can affect PSA level. Risk factors increase the patient's probability of developing prostate cancer. With no standard screening recommendations for prostate cancer, the provider has a greater responsibility to interpret results properly. Implications for practice are discussed.
			</description><dc:title>Accurate Use of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Determining Risk of Prostate Cancer</dc:title><dc:creator>Michelle A. Angie</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2009.11.012</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Features</prism:section><prism:startingPage>177</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>184</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000681/abstract?rss=yes"><title>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners Continuing Education Credit Application</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000681/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners Continuing Education Credit Application</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2010.01.027</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Features</prism:section><prism:startingPage>185</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>186</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509006667/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Facilitating Successful Aging: Encouraging Older Adults to Be Physically Active</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509006667/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
				Participation in regular physical activity has the potential to change the way we age. Evidence indicates that engaging in regular physical activity can provide dramatic physical, mental, and social benefits to older adults and decrease overall any-cause mortality. For older adults, the focus changes, and beside the promotion of health, maintenance of independent living becomes paramount. Nurse practitioners (NPs) must counsel older adults on the benefits of physical activity. The Stages of Change theory can be used to encourage older adults to change sedentary behavior and become more active.
			</description><dc:title>Facilitating Successful Aging: Encouraging Older Adults to Be Physically Active</dc:title><dc:creator>Amanda Adams-Fryatt</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2009.11.007</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Features</prism:section><prism:startingPage>187</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>192</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509005881/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Complementary Therapies in Osteoporosis</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509005881/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
				Osteoporosis is a disorder characterized by brittle, fragile bones. It results from unbalanced bone metabolism and often leads to bone fractures and, consequently, a decreased quality of life. It is complex in pathology and requires multifactorial management and treatment. It is imperative that nurse practitioners (NPs) maintain current best-practice knowledge to appropriately manage and treat this increasingly prevalent and debilitating disease. This article provides a review of information regarding recent evidence for pharmacological and supplemental therapies in osteoporosis, including strontium ranelate, genistein, and vitamin K.
			</description><dc:title>Complementary Therapies in Osteoporosis</dc:title><dc:creator>Darlene Higgs, Cathy Kessenich</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2009.10.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Features</prism:section><prism:startingPage>193</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>198</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000711/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Should a Written Collaborative Practice Agreement with a Physician Be Required for Nurse Practitioner Practice?</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000711/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				 Barbara Resnick, PhD, FAAN, FAANP, is a professor of nursing and adjunct professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine at the University of Maryland in Baltimore. She received her PhD from the University of Maryland and her MS in nursing from the University of Pennsylvania. Her research focus has been on motivation of older adults, particularly regarding performance of functional activities and exercise. She has authored over 100 manuscripts, numerous book chapters on both clinical and research topics relevant to the care of older adults, and, recently, a book on restorative care nursing.</description><dc:title>Should a Written Collaborative Practice Agreement with a Physician Be Required for Nurse Practitioner Practice?</dc:title><dc:creator>Barbara Resnick, Sandra Nettina</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2010.02.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Point/Counterpoint</prism:section><prism:startingPage>199</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>200</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509003997/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Nurse-Guided Completion of the BASDAI Questionnaire in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients with Low Literacy</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509003997/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
				The objective of this study was to assess nurse-guided patient completion of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Index (BASDAI). Between April and June 2008, all consecutive patients diagnosed with ankylosing spondylitis in a university clinic who were over 18 years old were enrolled in this study. Demographic data and socioeconomic status were collected by a questionnaire. First, the BASDAI forms were completed by the patient (self-report). The forms were completed again by the patient, this time with the guidance of an experienced study nurse (nurse-guided). If the absolute value of difference of self-reported and nurse-guided BASDAI was $ 1 cm (the minimum clinically important difference), these patients were defined as discordant. One hundred sixty-two patients (101 male, 62%; 61 female, 38%); mean age 35.6 years (standard deviation [SD] 11.4); and with a mean disease duration of 12.7 years (SD 7.8), were enrolled in the study. Mean BASDAI scores were no different between self-reported (3.07, SD 2.31) and nurse-guided (2.89, SD 2.31) scores. Thirty-eight patients (23.4%) had discordant results. Comparing the discordant to non-discordant patients, the discordant patients had more active disease (53% versus 27%, P = 0.004); were older (39 years, SD 11, versus 34 years, SD 11, P = 0.029); were more frequently female (58% versus 32%, P = 0.003); had # 8 years' education (55% versus 22%, P &lt; 0.001); and read the newspaper less (24% versus 50%, P = 0.005), respectively. After logistic regression analysis, the main factors explaining the discordance were: length of education, 3.1 (range 1.21–7.88); age, 1.19 (range 0.97–1.46); and frequency of newspaper reading, 2.63 (0.96–7.18). The BASDAI should be carefully evaluated in older patients with low literacy, and nurse-guided questionnaire completion may be an alternative approach in this subgroup.
			</description><dc:title>Nurse-Guided Completion of the BASDAI Questionnaire in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients with Low Literacy</dc:title><dc:creator>Umut Kalyoncu, Dilek Nakas, Mutlu Hayran, Laure Gossec, Omer Karadag, Ali Akdogan, Sedat Kiraz, Meral Calguneri, Ihsan Ertenli</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2009.06.002</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Features</prism:section><prism:startingPage>201</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>205</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509002931/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Older Adult Relocation: Considerations for Nurse Practitioners</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509002931/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
				The projected trends of the senior and baby-boomer population represent a projected demographic change that is nothing short of astounding. The nation's older adult population will continue to swell and, by 2035, will make up approximately 18% to 23% of the total population, nearly doubling this current age segment. With this significant and inevitable shift in demographics, individual, family, and community needs will increase proportionally. Nurse practitioners in primary care settings need to be cognizant of these trends and provide proactive assessments and health promotion advice to older patients and their families.
			</description><dc:title>Older Adult Relocation: Considerations for Nurse Practitioners</dc:title><dc:creator>Joseph Kirst, Sue Peck</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2009.05.015</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Features</prism:section><prism:startingPage>206</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>211</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509004000/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Nurse Practitioners' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Clinical Practices Regarding Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509004000/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Abstract: 
				This article describes knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices regarding treatment of tobacco use and dependence reported by nurse practitioners (NPs) interested in learning about evidence-based practices. Researchers analyzed baseline data from 193 licensed NPs prior to participating in Providers Practice Prevention: Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence. Results revealed domains where participants practiced in accordance with clinical practice guidelines and some areas where additional education and support may be necessary. NPs have a tremendous opportunity to reduce tobacco-related morbidity and mortality by addressing tobacco use, making it vitally important to support their implementation of evidence-based strategies.
			</description><dc:title>Nurse Practitioners' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Clinical Practices Regarding Treatment of Tobacco Use and Dependence</dc:title><dc:creator>Jamie L. Studts, Sarah McQueary Flynn, Tiffany Cross Dill, S. Lee Ridner, Celeste T. Worth, Sarah E. Walsh, Connie L. Sorrell</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2009.06.003</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Features</prism:section><prism:startingPage>212</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>219</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000309/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Alzheimer Disease</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000309/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				
					
				   Dementia is a very common problem, and Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia. More than 24 million people in the world have dementia, and the number is rising as the population ages. AD is a terrible disease that causes impaired cognition and function in the patient and much suffering on the part of the caregivers. It is the fifth leading cause of death in the United States.</description><dc:title>Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Alzheimer Disease</dc:title><dc:creator>Maren S. Mayhew</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2010.01.009</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Prescription Pad</prism:section><prism:startingPage>220</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>221</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509006941/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Advance Beneficiary Notices of Non-Coverage Modifiers</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509006941/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				
					
				   Effective April 1, 2010, two HCPCS level 2 modifiers have been updated to distinguish between voluntary and required uses of liability notices:
				</description><dc:title>Advance Beneficiary Notices of Non-Coverage Modifiers</dc:title><dc:creator>Jan DiSantostefano</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2009.11.011</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Decoding Codes</prism:section><prism:startingPage>222</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>223</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509006953/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Diagnosing Premenstrual Syndrome</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415509006953/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>
				
					
				   Premenstrual symptoms are common among menstruating women, with approximately 75% reporting some discomfort with their cycles. However, an estimated 10% of women experience premenstrual syndrome (PMS), which is characterized by symptoms severe enough to interfere with daily life. While PMS can have a devastating impact on the quality of a woman's life and work, this complex disorder is poorly understood and can be challenging to diagnose. Nurse practitioners (NPs), regardless of practice specialty, are more likely than not to see patients suffering from PMS.</description><dc:title>Diagnosing Premenstrual Syndrome</dc:title><dc:creator>Kimberly Raines</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2009.12.013</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Diagnostic Tips</prism:section><prism:startingPage>224</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>225</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS155541550900693X/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Determinants of Health: A Framework for Advanced Health Assessment</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS155541550900693X/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Determinants of Health: A Framework for Advanced Health Assessment</dc:title><dc:creator>Scharalda Jeanfreau, Demetrius Porche, O. Danny Lee</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2009.12.012</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Men's Health</prism:section><prism:startingPage>226</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>227</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000310/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Implementation of Health Information Technology</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000310/abstract?rss=yes</link><description>Many practices already use some form of health information technology (HIT) or electronic health records (EHRs). If your practice does not use this technology now, you probably have had conversations about what it would take to implement an HIT or EHR system. Many believe that the proliferation and comprehensive use of HIT across all health care provider groups will significantly increase the quality of health care delivered in this country. In fact, in its analysis of budget options for Congress, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) suggested that health IT would “improve the information available to clinicians at the time of treatment by encouraging the use of evidence-based medicine and by helping physicians manage patients with complex, chronic conditions.” The report also states that HIT can reduce costs by “reducing the number of inappropriate tests and procedures, reducing paperwork and administrative overhead, and decreasing the number of adverse events resulting from medical errors” (Budget Options. Health Care Congressional Budget Office. Vol. 1, option 46, p. 88). But did you know that Congress and others in the federal government may play a role in helping you to have access to HIT?</description><dc:title>Implementation of Health Information Technology</dc:title><dc:creator></dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2010.01.010</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>ACNP Forum</prism:section><prism:startingPage>228</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>231</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000413/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Health Policy</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000413/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Health Policy</dc:title><dc:creator>Sandy Wilbanks, Sandra Wilbanks</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2010.01.020</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Answer Key—Crossword</prism:section><prism:startingPage>232</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>232</prism:endingPage></item><item rdf:about="http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000401/abstract?rss=yes"><title>Sleep Disorders in Children</title><link>http://www.npjournal.org/article/PIIS1555415510000401/abstract?rss=yes</link><description></description><dc:title>Sleep Disorders in Children</dc:title><dc:creator>Sandy Wilbanks, Sandra Wilbanks</dc:creator><dc:identifier>10.1016/j.nurpra.2010.01.019</dc:identifier><dc:source>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners 6, 3 (2010)</dc:source><dc:date>2010-03-01</dc:date><prism:publicationName>The Journal for Nurse Practitioners</prism:publicationName><prism:publicationDate>2010-03-01</prism:publicationDate><prism:volume>6</prism:volume><prism:number>3</prism:number><prism:issueIdentifier>S1555-4155(10)X0003-4</prism:issueIdentifier><prism:section>Test Your Knowledge Crossword</prism:section><prism:startingPage>236</prism:startingPage><prism:endingPage>236</prism:endingPage></item></rdf:RDF>