The Journal for Nurse Practitioners
Volume 6, Issue 6 , Pages 417-424, June 2010

Primary Screening for Cervical Cancer: Incorporating New Guidelines and Technologies into Clinical Practice

  • Mary Lauren Lemieux

      Affiliations

    • Mary Lauren Lemieux, MS, WHNP-BC, is a clinical assistant professor at the Catholic University of America School of Nursing in Washington, DC, and a DNP candidate at Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing in Baltimore, MD.

Abstract 

Cervical cancer screening has been a remarkable success story in the United States. The annual Papanicolaou (Pap) test is ingrained in the U.S. healthcare system, yet recent evidence suggests that many women do not need yearly screening. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' (ACOG) newest guidelines, published in December 2009, challenge traditional cervical cancer screening modes and intervals with level-A recommendations for starting later and screening low-risk women less frequently. The aim of this article is to provide an evidence-based approach to incorporation of the new cervical cancer screening guidelines into clinical practice by reviewing the goals of screening, epidemiology of human papillomavirus and cervical cancer, costs of overscreening, and rationale for the specific recommendations.

Keywords:  cancer screening , cervical cancer , cervical cytology , clinical practice guidelines , human papillomavirus , women's health

 

 This continuing education activity is designed to augment the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of nurses and nurse practitioners regarding the latest guidelines for cervical cancer screening.At the conclusion of this activity, the participant will be able to:

a.Describe the goal of primary cervical cancer screening

b.Identify the appropriate population in which to use HPV DNA testing to screen for cervical cancer

c.Identify recommended testing and screening intervals for women based on age, risks, and history

The authors, reviewers, editors, nurse planners, and pilot testers all report no financial relationships that would pose a conflict of interest.The authors do not present any off-label or non-FDA approved recommendations for treatment.There is no implied endorsement by NPA or ANCC of any commercial products mentioned in the article.

PII: S1555-4155(10)00124-8

doi:10.1016/j.nurpra.2010.03.001

The Journal for Nurse Practitioners
Volume 6, Issue 6 , Pages 417-424, June 2010